In re Haar
This text of 240 A.D. 1006 (In re Haar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
That part of the decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county which confirmed the report of the referee and allowed the claim of the executors of the last will and testament of Annie J. Haar, deceased, to the extent of $5,298.92, with interest from January 12, 1932, reversed on the law and the facts and said claim disallowed, with costs to the appellant out of the estate of Annie J. Haar, deceased. In our opinion, the burden was on the representatives of Annie J. Haar to prove the claim of her estate, which burden did not shift and was not sustained by the proofs. In all other respects the decree is unanimously affirmed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-haar-nyappdiv-1933.