In Re H-E-B, LP, D/B/A Joe V's Smart Shop v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re H-E-B, LP, D/B/A Joe V's Smart Shop v. the State of Texas (In Re H-E-B, LP, D/B/A Joe V's Smart Shop v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 29, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00621-CV ——————————— IN RE HEB, LP D/B/A JOE V’S SMART SHOP, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, HEB, LP, doing business as Joe V’s Smart Shop, filed a petition for
writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s May 21, 2025 order denying relator’s
motion to compel discovery requesting medical records of real party in interest, Petra Mendoza.1 Relator’s petition requested that the Court grant its petition for writ of
mandamus and “order the trial court to compel the discovery sought in the motion.”
We conclude that relator has failed to establish it is entitled to mandamus
relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). The Court therefore denies relator’s petition
for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
1 The underlying case is Petra Mendoza v. HEB, LP d/b/a Joe V’s Smart Shop, Cause No. 2023-01462, in the 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Perdue presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re H-E-B, LP, D/B/A Joe V's Smart Shop v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-h-e-b-lp-dba-joe-vs-smart-shop-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.