In Re H-E-B, LP, D/B/A Joe V's Smart Shop v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion issued August 29, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00621-CV ——————————— IN RE HEB, LP D/B/A JOE V’S SMART SHOP, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, HEB, LP, doing business as Joe V’s Smart Shop, filed a petition for

writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s May 21, 2025 order denying relator’s

motion to compel discovery requesting medical records of real party in interest, Petra Mendoza.1 Relator’s petition requested that the Court grant its petition for writ of

mandamus and “order the trial court to compel the discovery sought in the motion.”

We conclude that relator has failed to establish it is entitled to mandamus

relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). The Court therefore denies relator’s petition

for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

1 The underlying case is Petra Mendoza v. HEB, LP d/b/a Joe V’s Smart Shop, Cause No. 2023-01462, in the 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Perdue presiding.