In re Gupta

123 N.E.3d 696
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 2019
DocketSupreme Court Case No. 19S-DI-71
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 N.E.3d 696 (In re Gupta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gupta, 123 N.E.3d 696 (Ind. 2019).

Opinion

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission files a "Verified Emergency Petition For Order Of Interim Suspension Pursuant To Admis. Disc. R. 23, Section 11.1(b)," requesting that Respondent be suspended immediately from the practice of law in this State, pending further order of this Court or final resolution of any resulting disciplinary action, due to alleged misconduct that may cause Respondent's continued practice of law during the pendency of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding to pose a substantial threat of harm to the public, clients, potential clients, or the administration of justice. Respondent has filed a response conceding an interim suspension is warranted but requesting that the effective date of an interim suspension be delayed for a short period of time.

Being duly advised, the Court now GRANTS the petition and ORDERS that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26). The suspension shall continue until further order of this Court or final resolution of the underlying disciplinary action.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Raymond Gupta
Indiana Supreme Court, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 N.E.3d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gupta-ind-2019.