In re Gunzberger

M.D. Pennsylvania

In re Gunzberger

268 F. 673, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 1, 1920

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 268 F. 673 (In re Gunzberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gunzberger, 268 F. 673, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920 (M.D. Pa. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

WITHER, District Judge.

The question presented in the certificate for review has been fully and well considered in an opinion filed by the learned referee, which lias the approval of the court and may be considered as expressing the opinion of the court. It follows that the exceptions filed are set aside, and the order of the referee, disallowing the claim oí J. E. Dayton Company for allowance of $115 out of the funds in hands of the trustee in bankruptcy, except as an unsecured claim, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WITHER, District Judge.

The question presented in the certificate for review has been fully and well considered in an opinion filed by the learned referee, which lias the approval of the court and may be considered as expressing the opinion of the court. It follows that the exceptions filed are set aside, and the order of the referee, disallowing the claim oí J. E. Dayton Company for allowance of $115 out of the funds in hands of the trustee in bankruptcy, except as an unsecured claim, is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 F. 673, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gunzberger-pamd-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack