In re Gunzberger
268 F. 673, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920
Opinion
The question presented in the certificate for review has been fully and well considered in an opinion filed by the learned referee, which lias the approval of the court and may be considered as expressing the opinion of the court. It follows that the exceptions filed are set aside, and the order of the referee, disallowing the claim oí J. E. Dayton Company for allowance of $115 out of the funds in hands of the trustee in bankruptcy, except as an unsecured claim, is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Gunzberger, 268 F. 673, 1920 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 920 (M.D. Pa. 1920).
268 F. 673 (In re Gunzberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nino v. Moyer
437 B.R. 230 (W.D. Michigan, 2009)
First State Bank v. Muzio
666 P.2d 777 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1983)
Patton v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.
246 F. Supp. 1015 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
In re Brooks
27 F.2d 146 (N.D. Texas, 1928)
Violette v. Walsh
272 F. 1014 (D. Montana, 1921)