In re Guillory

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Guillory

225 So. 3d 1057, 2017 WL 3902997

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 6, 2017·No. NO. 2017-B-1128·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he neglected his client’s legal matter. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Elbert Lee Guillory, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17622, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM

| Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that he neglected his client’s legal matter. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Elbert Lee Guillory, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17622, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Guillory, 225 So. 3d 1057, 2017 WL 3902997 (La. 2017).

Pincite

225 So. 3d 1057 (In re Guillory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.