in Re: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.

DecidedApril 18, 2006

Docket13-06-00166-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (in Re: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-166-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

IN RE: GUIDANT CORPORATION, ET AL.

___________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relators, Guidant Corporation, et al., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court on April 10, 2006. On the same, date, relators filed a motion to dismiss the mandamus action. In their motion, relators state that the issues raised by this mandamus proceeding are now moot. Accordingly, relators request that this mandamus action be dismissed.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and relators= motion to dismiss mandamus action, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Relators= motion to dismiss is granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 18^th day of April, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-06-166-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

IN RE: GUIDANT CORPORATION, ET AL.

___________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relators, Guidant Corporation, et al., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court on April 10, 2006. On the same, date, relators filed a motion to dismiss the mandamus action. In their motion, relators state that the issues raised by this mandamus proceeding are now moot. Accordingly, relators request that this mandamus action be dismissed.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and relators= motion to dismiss mandamus action, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Relators= motion to dismiss is granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 18^th day of April, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-guidant-corporation-guidant-sales-corporatio-texapp-2006.