in Re: Guidant Corporation & Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.
This text of in Re: Guidant Corporation & Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (in Re: Guidant Corporation & Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-05-767-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE GUIDANT CORPORATION & CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion[1]
Relators, Guidant Corporation & Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on December 21, 2005. The Court, having
examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and its record, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 27th day of December, 2005.
[1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Guidant Corporation & Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-guidant-corporation-cardiac-pacemakers-inc-texapp-2005.