In re Guardianship of Rudy
601 N.E.2d 43, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1448
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Guardianship of Rudy. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Ohio St. 3d 394 →
Opinion
Trumbull County, Nos. 90-T-4398 and 90-T-4416. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Trumbull County. Upon consideration of appellee David W. Rudy’s motion for continuance of oral argument,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion for continuance of oral argument be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective November 2, 1992.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Guardianship of Rudy, 601 N.E.2d 43, 65 Ohio St. 3d 1448 (Ohio 1992).
601 N.E.2d 43 (In re Guardianship of Rudy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.