In re Guardianship of Prince

209 P. 90, 104 Or. 670, 1922 Ore. LEXIS 49
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 19, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 209 P. 90 (In re Guardianship of Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Guardianship of Prince, 209 P. 90, 104 Or. 670, 1922 Ore. LEXIS 49 (Or. 1922).

Opinion

McCOUET, J.

This is an appeal by Winthrop Hammond from an. order of the Circuit Court for. Multnomah County, fixing his compensation as guardian of the estate of Thomas Prince, a person incapable of conducting his own affairs. The guardian was appointed January 3, 1918, and his trust terminated by the death of the ward, February 3, 1920.

Section 1340, Or. L., provides:

“Every guardian shall be allowed the amount of all his reasonable expenses incurred in the execution of his trust, and shall also have such compensation for his services as the court in which his accounts are settled shall consider just and reasonable.”

The court allowed the guardian as compensation, $25,000. He made a claim for $100,000. Under a statute such as that above set forth, the amount of compensation to be allowed a guardian is within the sound discretion of the court in which the guardian’s accounts are settled, and the determination of the court in fixing the allowance will not be disturbed on appeal, unless it clearly appears that there has been a manifest abuse of that discretion, or that the amount allowed, in view of the time, talent and character of service employed in. the management of the trust estate, is disproportionate or not equivalent to the services performed: 21 Cyc. 173; In re McCullough’s Estate, 31 Or. 86, 94 (49 Pac. 886); In re Assignment of Bank of Oregon, 32 Or. 84, 90 (51 Pac. 81); In re Assignment of Woodall, 33 Or. 382, 384 (54 Pac. 209).

At the time the guardian was appointed to administer his affairs, Thomas Prince was 77 years of age. While in his prime, he had been a successful manufacturer in Worcester, Massachusetts, where he established an industry operated and conducted under [673]*673the name of the Reed-Prince Manufacturing Company, in which he at all times owned and held a large interest, yielding at the time of the guardianship dividends of more than $5,000 per month. Mr. Prince retired from the active management of his manufacturing business before 1898 and intrusted the same to younger men; and at the time of the appointment of the guardian, William L. Ames, a nephew, was acting as trustee of those interests for Mr. Prince under an appointment theretofore made by the latter.

On retiring from business, Thomas Prince came to Oregon, and interested himself in walnut culture in Yamhill County; he acquired several pieces of valuable land in Yamhill and Washington Counties, and invested moderate sums of money in several local enterprises, such as a creamery company and fruit cannery. He also purchased a number of small tracts of land jointly with other persons, and advanced considerable sums of money to those associated with him in such purchases.

In 1915 his faculties had become somewhat impaired by ill health and advanced age, in which condition he was induced by one O. K. Jeffrey to consent to finance the construction of dwelling-houses situated upon lots in Portland, Oregon, which lots, were acquired or controlled by Jeffrey. The money so advanced was to be repaid upon the sale of the dwellings so constructed. The enterprise was conducted under the unincorporated firm name of Oregon Home Builders, Jeffrey being the active head thereof: the dwellings did not sell readily, and from its inception, the concern lost money.

In May, 1917, Mr. Prince suffered a stroke of paralysis, in connection with which he was compelled [674]*674to undergo a surgical operation, whereby he was confined in a hospital for several months. Jeffrey acquired a tract of land, and while Mr. Prince was convalescing the Oregon Home Builders erected a plant thereon for the manufacture of aeroplanes; Jeffrey prevailed upon Mr. Prince to advance the funds required to construct the plant and also to agree to advance the money necessary for the weekly pay-roll of those employed in the manufacture of aeroplanes, amounting to about $1,000 per week. By January 1, 1918, Mr. Prince had advanced in cash to the Oregon Home Builders about $157,000, and in addition had incurred a number of large obligations, including that of the pay-roll above mentioned. In part payment of the funds so advanced, Jeffrey, in the name of the Oregon Home Builders, had conveyed to Mr. Prince, at excessive prices, nineteen or more dwelling-houses in Portland, Oregon, with the land upon which they were situated and a tract of acreage in Clackamas County, also eight sales contracts for the sale of dwelling-houses. All of the properties so transferred were encumbered, and together they represented equities having a value of about $50,000. Mr. Prince had been compelled to borrow large sums to meet the demands for money made by Jeffrey, to secure some of which he had placed mortgages upon his real property in Washington and Yamhill Counties.

Stanley Simmons, a favorite grandnephew of Mr. Prince, visited the latter in December, 1917, and discovered that his affairs had become badly involved because of the large demands made upon his cash resources by Jeffrey, and also that Mr. Prince in his enfeebled condition of body and mind was incapable of administering the properties belonging to his es[675]*675tate or of conducting his own affairs so as to stop further losses, whereupon it was. decided, with the acquiescence of Mr. Prince, to place his affairs under the management of some competent person. Winthrop Hammond was an old acquaintance in whom Mr. Prince had full confidence, and he desired that Hammond he intrusted with the management of his affairs. It was decided that the appointment ' of Hammond as guardian of the estate of Prince was the best method of bringing about that result. Accordingly, Mr. Prince, Harold Prince, his son, and Stanley Simmons joined in a petition for the appointment of Hammond as guardian, upon which petition the order appointing Hammond as such guardian was made. The son, Harold Prince, had little or no business ability.

An appraisement of the estate disclosed assets of approximately $441,000, including real property appraised at $333,641.15 and personal property, consisting of tools, implements, office furniture, livestock, corporate stock, notes, accounts and demands of various kinds, appraised at $108,528.36. Much of the personal property was of a character that cash could not be readily realized thereon. The indebtedness of the estate was approximately $210,000. About $94,000 of this indebtedness consisted of mortgages, liens and taxes upon the real property of the estate. The ward had outstanding, his unsecured promissory notes for $28,277.64; one note for $10,-000 had been given a bank in Worcester, Massachusetts, and was then overdue; payment of this note was extended for a year or more. Some other notes and obligations, including claims for mechanics’ liens and taxes, were about to mature. There was included in this indebtedness an item of $30,000, [676]*676due to the government as income tax, which was readily adjusted by the guardian by paying $6,600. There was also a claim of Dr. Ong for $12,500, for performing a surgical operation upon the ward, which the guardian settled without a great deal of controversy for $1,250.

The connection of the ward with the aeroplane plant above mentioned was the most serious matter that confronted the guardian upon assuming his trust. Relief was obtained by closing down the plant at once, thereby terminating the necessity of meeting a pay-roll. A corporation was formed, known as the Broadway Investment Company. Two thirds of the capital stock of this corporation was issued to the Prince estate and one third to Jeffrey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godfrey v. Gempler
70 P.2d 551 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1937)
Re Thomas Prince Estate
246 P. 713 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
Ong v. Idleman
221 P. 554 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 P. 90, 104 Or. 670, 1922 Ore. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-guardianship-of-prince-or-1922.