In re Guardianship of Fegan

45 Cal. 176
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·No. No. 3,483·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The validity of the order appealed from must be determined altogether by reference to the statute. The power of the Probate Court to appoint a guardian for an insane person under the statute is not defeated or taken away by the fact that such insane person is a married person. And in case the insane person be the wife, there is no rule of law which prefers the husband as such guardian, or forbids the Court to appoint another person to be the guardian, if, in its opinion, the husband is not a fit person to discharge the duties of the guardianship.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Guardianship of Fegan, 45 Cal. 176 (Cal. 1872).

45 Cal. 176 (In re Guardianship of Fegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. VanCamp
135 N.E. 580 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1922)
Hodgdon v. S. Pac. R.R Co.
17 P. 928 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Gardner v. Maroney
95 Ill. 552 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1880)