In re Grundstein

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Grundstein

941 N.E.2d 1203, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1401

DecidedFebruary 18, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 941 N.E.2d 1203 (In re Grundstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Grundstein, 941 N.E.2d 1203, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

On June 3, 2009, this court found Robert Grundstein to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Grundstein was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On February 10, 2011, Grundstein submitted a motion for leave to file a complaint for writ of mandamus and prohibition.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the motion for leave of Robert Grundstein is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On June 3, 2009, this court found Robert Grundstein to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Grundstein was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On February 10, 2011, Grundstein submitted a motion for leave to file a complaint for writ of mandamus and prohibition.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the motion for leave of Robert Grundstein is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

941 N.E.2d 1203, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grundstein-ohio-2011.