In re Gruber

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gruber

705 A.2d 1211, 152 N.J. 451, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 118

DecidedFebruary 26, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 705 A.2d 1211 (In re Gruber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gruber, 705 A.2d 1211, 152 N.J. 451, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 118 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[452]*452ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on September 18, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD L. GRUBER of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in .1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with Office of Attorney Ethics), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD L. GRUBER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[452]*452ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on September 18, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that RICHARD L. GRUBER of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in .1977, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with Office of Attorney Ethics), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD L. GRUBER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 A.2d 1211, 152 N.J. 451, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gruber-nj-1998.