In re Gross
This text of 795 A.2d 375 (In re Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated February 25, 2002, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he would, at a minimum, adopt the recommendation of the Hearing Committee that an independent auditor audit petitioner’s handling of client funds for a period of three years and submit a report to the Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
795 A.2d 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gross-pa-2002.