In re Gross

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gross

892 A.2d 680, 186 N.J. 157, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 174

DecidedMarch 9, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 892 A.2d 680 (In re Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gross, 892 A.2d 680, 186 N.J. 157, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 174 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-216, concluding that HOWARD A. GROSS of CAMDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 7.3(d) (giving of something of value to a non-lawyer in exchange for the procurement of clients);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded on the basis of the passage of time since the last act of unethical conduct that the term of suspension should be suspended;

And HOWARD A. GROSS having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

[158]*158It is ORDERED that HOWARD A. GROSS is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months; and it is further

ORDERED that the term of suspension is hereby suspended; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI