In re Groban

Supreme Court

In re Groban

351 U.S. 903, 76 S. Ct. 693

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Groban. Read the opinion of the Court — 352 U.S. 330 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 23, 1956·No. No. 545·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. Rule 16 (4). The parties are requested to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments this Court’s jurisdiction to consider any questions raised by the possible applicability of In re Murchison, 349 U. S. 133, and In re Oliver, 333 U. S. 257, to the proceedings involved in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. Rule 16 (4). The parties are requested to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments this Court’s jurisdiction to consider any questions raised by the possible applicability of In re Murchison, 349 U. S. 133, and In re Oliver, 333 U. S. 257, to the proceedings involved in this case.

In re Groban, 351 U.S. 903, 76 S. Ct. 693 (1956).

Pincite

351 U.S. 903 (In re Groban) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related