In re Gritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gritz

82 A.D.2d 814, 440 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14480

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 A.D.2d 814 (In re Gritz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gritz, 82 A.D.2d 814, 440 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by respondent, an attorney presently accused of six charges of professional misconduct, who upon his own admission, has been found guilty upon his own plea of guilty to one count of tax evasion under the Federal statute (US Code, tit 26, § 7201), to accept his resignation from the Bar of the State of New York. The resignation is rejected by this court, without prejudice to renew upon an amended resignation covering all six charges of the petition, in compliance with the rules of this court. The hearing before the Special Referee shall continue expeditiously. The respondent, having admitted to having been guilty of a “serious crime” is suspended from the practice of law, pending final resolution of the charges. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Lazer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by respondent, an attorney presently accused of six charges of professional misconduct, who upon his own admission, has been found guilty upon his own plea of guilty to one count of tax evasion under the Federal statute (US Code, tit 26, § 7201), to accept his resignation from the Bar of the State of New York. The resignation is rejected by this court, without prejudice to renew upon an amended resignation covering all six charges of the petition, in compliance with the rules of this court. The hearing before the Special Referee shall continue expeditiously. The respondent, having admitted to having been guilty of a “serious crime” is suspended from the practice of law, pending final resolution of the charges. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Lazer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 814, 440 N.Y.S.2d 577, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gritz-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack