In re Grittner

520 B.R. 439, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4643, 2014 WL 6783755
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont
DecidedNovember 4, 2014
DocketNo. 14-10529
StatusPublished

This text of 520 B.R. 439 (In re Grittner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Grittner, 520 B.R. 439, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4643, 2014 WL 6783755 (Vt. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

Denying Debtor’s Application for Waiver of the Chapter 7 Filing Fee and Granting Debtor’s Motion to Defer Due Date and Limit the Number of Installments

COLLEEN A. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge.

On September 26, 2014, Linda R. Gritt-ner (the “Debtor”) filed a voluntary Chapter 7 petition (doc. # 1) and an application for waiver of the Chapter 7 filing fee (doc. #2) (the “Application”). On October 2, 2014, the Court entered an Order denying the Debtor’s Application and directing the Debtor to pay the filing fee in four installments, with the first installment due on October 17, 2014, and the last installment due on December 31, 2014 (doc. # 8).

On October 8, 2014, the Debtor filed a motion for reconsideration of the October 2, 2014 Order (doc. # 10). As grounds for reconsideration, the Debtor alleged her dire financial situation, coupled with the [441]*441substantial expense and difficulty of caring for her disabled child, made it impossible for her to make the required payments on her home and vehicle loans and pay the filing fee, even in installments. The Debt- or also provided new information concerning the sources of her income, including a “flexible family spending account” disbursement in the amount of $82 per month, which she classified as “other governmental assistance.”

On October 15, 2014, the Court entered an Order granting the Debtor’s motion for reconsideration, subject to the Debtor filing a supplement to her Application. In its Order, the Court articulated the two-pronged test the Court must apply to determine whether a debtor is eligible for a waiver of the Chapter 7 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Donahue
410 B.R. 751 (N.D. Georgia, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 B.R. 439, 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 4643, 2014 WL 6783755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grittner-vtb-2014.