In re Grinnell
11 F. Cas. 50, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 137
Opinion
On this petition the endorsement by BLATCHFORD, District Judge, is: “I do not see that any leave is necessary. S. B.”
[For a full discussion of the same point by Blatchford, District Judge, see Case No. 5,S30.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Grinnell, 11 F. Cas. 50, 9 Nat. Bank. Reg. 137 (S.D.N.Y. 1874).
11 F. Cas. 50 (In re Grinnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradley v. Adams Express Co.
3 F. 895 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1880)