In re Griggs

282 A.D. 263, 122 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4449
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There were charges made against respondent, one of which involved conversion of the sum of $128.80, which sum was returned by him, and the others of which involved professional misconduct in matters involving small amounts.

The Referee found that respondent’s guilt was established, but that his professional misconduct was not occasioned by dishonest intent or lack of professional ability. The Referee stated that throughout the hearings respondent was co-operative and ready to stipulate facts.”

The report of the Referee should be confirmed and the respondent should be suspended for three months.

Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ., concur.

Respondent suspended for a period of three months. [See post, p. 873.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Griggs, 282 A.D. 263, 122 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 263 (In re Griggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Griggs
1 A.D.2d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)