In re Griffith

829 A.2d 661
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 19, 2003
DocketNo. 702 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 829 A.2d 661 (In re Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Griffith, 829 A.2d 661 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2003, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 28, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that DANIEL A. GRIFFITH, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 A.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-griffith-pa-2003.