In re Griffith
This text of 280 F. 878 (In re Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed, praying that Griffith and Son, a partnership, but not its members, be adjudged bankrupt. The act of bankruptcy charged is founded upon insolvency. The partnership has moved that the petition be dismissed upon the ground that it is not therein alleged, either that the members of the partnership are insolvent or that the assets of the firm combined with the assets of the members in excess of their individual debts, are insufficient to pay the partnership debts. The motion to dismiss must be sustained, upon the authority of Francis v. McNeal, 228 U. S. 695, 33 Sup. Ct. 701, 57 L. Ed. 1029, L. R. A. 1915E, 706, [879]*879and 186 Fed. 481, 108 C. C. A. 459, and Vaccaro v. Security Bank of Memphis, 103 Fed. 436, 442, unless the defects in the petition be cured by amendment within 15 days after the date hereof. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Atlanta & W. P. R. Co., 238 Fed. 36, 151 C. C. A. 112; General Order in Bankruptcy No. 37 (89 Fed. xiv, 32 C. C. A. xiv).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 F. 878, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-griffith-ded-1922.