In re Griffith

280 F. 878, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 845
CourtDistrict Court, D. Delaware
DecidedMarch 21, 1922
DocketNo. 410
StatusPublished

This text of 280 F. 878 (In re Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Griffith, 280 F. 878, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 845 (D. Del. 1922).

Opinion

MORRIS, District Judge.

An involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed, praying that Griffith and Son, a partnership, but not its members, be adjudged bankrupt. The act of bankruptcy charged is founded upon insolvency. The partnership has moved that the petition be dismissed upon the ground that it is not therein alleged, either that the members of the partnership are insolvent or that the assets of the firm combined with the assets of the members in excess of their individual debts, are insufficient to pay the partnership debts. The motion to dismiss must be sustained, upon the authority of Francis v. McNeal, 228 U. S. 695, 33 Sup. Ct. 701, 57 L. Ed. 1029, L. R. A. 1915E, 706, [879]*879and 186 Fed. 481, 108 C. C. A. 459, and Vaccaro v. Security Bank of Memphis, 103 Fed. 436, 442, unless the defects in the petition be cured by amendment within 15 days after the date hereof. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Atlanta & W. P. R. Co., 238 Fed. 36, 151 C. C. A. 112; General Order in Bankruptcy No. 37 (89 Fed. xiv, 32 C. C. A. xiv).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Francis v. McNeal
228 U.S. 695 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Vaccaro v. Security Bank
103 F. 436 (Sixth Circuit, 1900)
Francis v. McNeal
186 F. 481 (Third Circuit, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 F. 878, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-griffith-ded-1922.