In Re Griffith

162 So. 921, 230 Ala. 696
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 20, 1935
Docket6 Div. 711.
StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 921 (In Re Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Griffith, 162 So. 921, 230 Ala. 696 (Ala. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM,

Pretermitting many of the charges we think the evidence fully sustains those charges predicated upon a violation of section 4912 of the Code of 1923 and justified the conclusion and judgment of the commission which is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 921, 230 Ala. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-griffith-ala-1935.