Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Griffin

In re Griffin

288 A.D.2d 747, 734 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 747 (In re Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Griffin, 288 A.D.2d 747, 734 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was suspended from practice for a period of one year, nunc pro tunc [748]*748to August 11, 1999 (Matter of Griffin, 278 AD2d 581). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner opposes the application.

Because we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), we deny his application for reinstatement.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application for reinstatement is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Griffin
278 A.D.2d 581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 747, 734 N.Y.S.2d 502, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-griffin-nyappdiv-2001.