Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Griffen

In re Griffen

103 A.D.2d 662, 481 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20194
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Griffen. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 A.D.2d 1183 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 7, 1984·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice on May 24,1960 by the Appellate Division, Third Department.

The petition charges respondent with appearing in the Chautauqua County Family Court as a Law Guardian; with filing, without fee, an estate tax return during the period of his suspension (see Matter of Griffen, 92 AD2d 371; 91 AD2d 1183); and with signing a statement under oath in his application for reinstatement that he did not engage in the practice of law during the period of his suspension. Respondent has admitted the charges.

Respondent is guilty of misconduct and should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further order of the court.

Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ., concur.

Order of suspension entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Griffen, 103 A.D.2d 662, 481 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

103 A.D.2d 662 (In re Griffen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Griffen
91 A.D.2d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re Griffen
92 A.D.2d 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)