In Re: Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re: Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 18, 2023
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00984-CV
IN RE GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-19065
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Molberg In its October 5, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges a trial
court’s order denying its motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude
that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Ken Molberg/ 230984f.p05 KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-greyhound-lines-inc-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.