in Re Greyhound Lines, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 23, 2012
• Docket: 13-12-00075-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00075-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE GREYHOUND LINES, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justice Garza, and Justice Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1 Relator, Greyhound Lines, Inc., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which

it contends that respondent, the Honorable Migdalia Lopez, Presiding Judge of the

197th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, abused her discretion, leaving

relator without an adequate appellate remedy, by denying relator’s Motion for Protection

and Motion to Reconsider regarding a deposition noticed by real parties in interest.

Real parties in interest are: Motor Coach Industries, Inc.; Motor Coach Industries

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying [mandamus] relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”). Service Parts, Inc.; ArvinMeritor, Inc.; Daniel Campos, individually and as representative

of the estate of Christina Lozano Campos; Maria L. Lozano; Anna B. Schermerhorn;

Adriana L. Pruitt; Amalia F. Heather; and Daniel N. Campos.

Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition and responses filed by

real parties in interest, this Court is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself

entitled to the relief requested and that the petition should be denied. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 23rd day of February, 2012.