In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas (In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00348-CV
In re Gregory Royal
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Gregory Royal filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the
Travis County District Court had failed to file the reporter’s record in cause number
03-24-00018-CV, Royal v. MB Landscape Solutions. He also requested in his petition for writ of
mandamus an extension of time to file his appellant’s brief 45 days after the filing of the
reporter’s record. The reporter’s record has been filed in cause number 03-24-00018-CV, and
the Court has granted the requested extension of time to file his appellant’s brief in that case.
Accordingly, we dismiss as moot the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis
Filed: June 26, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gregory-royal-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.