In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 26, 2024·No. 03-24-00348-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00348-CV

In re Gregory Royal

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Gregory Royal filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the

Travis County District Court had failed to file the reporter’s record in cause number

03-24-00018-CV, Royal v. MB Landscape Solutions. He also requested in his petition for writ of

mandamus an extension of time to file his appellant’s brief 45 days after the filing of the

reporter’s record. The reporter’s record has been filed in cause number 03-24-00018-CV, and

the Court has granted the requested extension of time to file his appellant’s brief in that case.

Accordingly, we dismiss as moot the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Filed: June 26, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas (In Re Gregory Royal v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.