in Re: Gregory Eugene Muse
This text of in Re: Gregory Eugene Muse (in Re: Gregory Eugene Muse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-07-00482-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: GREGORY EUGENE MUSE, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
RELATOR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gregory Eugene Muse has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he complains that the Smith County District Clerk's Office has failed to forward his postconviction writ to the court of criminal appeals.1 Jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings seeking relief from final felony judgments lies exclusively with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717-18 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Intermediate appellate courts have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in such matters. See id.; Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2007-08). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
SAM GRIFFITH
Justice
Opinion delivered January 9, 2008.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
1 The respondents are Lois Rogers, Smith County District Clerk, and Sue Pope, “a Smith County clerk.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Gregory Eugene Muse, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gregory-eugene-muse-texapp-2008.