in Re Gregory Dunsomore
This text of in Re Gregory Dunsomore (in Re Gregory Dunsomore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction, and Memorandum Opinion filed May 20, 2008.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-00385 -CV
IN RE GREGORY DUNSMORE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 6, 2008, relator Gregory Dunsmore filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In the petition, relators requests that we compel the Harris County District Clerk and the clerk of the County Criminal Court at Law No. 14 to file his petition for writ of habeas corpus.
We do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district or county clerk unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221; In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 181 (Tex. App.BHouston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Relator has not argued, nor does the mandamus record demonstrate, that a writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Petitions Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction and Memorandum Opinion filed, May 20, 2008.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, and Justices Fowler and Boyce.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Gregory Dunsomore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gregory-dunsomore-texapp-2008.