in Re: Gregory B. Jackson
This text of in Re: Gregory B. Jackson (in Re: Gregory B. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 15, 2002
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-02-00560-CV
IN RE GREGORY B. JACKSON, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND TO SUPPLEMENT AND AMEND BY CHANGING PARTIES
On June 13, 2002, the Court issued an opinion dismissing relator's petition for writ of mandamus against the Texas Attorney General, John Cornyn. Relator has filed a "motion for rehearing and to supplement and amend by changing parties," in which he requests this Court to change the named respondent to Harris County District Attorney Charles Rosenthal.
This Court has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a county district attorney. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §§ 22.002(c), 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2002). Relator's motion is denied, and the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Jennings, and Price. (1)
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Gregory B. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gregory-b-jackson-texapp-2002.