In re Greenman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Greenman

204 A.3d 284, 237 N.J. 307

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 9, 2019·No. D-77 September Term 2018; 082336·Published

Opinion

ORDERED that Sal Greenman comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further **308ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDERED that Sal Greenman comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further **308ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

In re Greenman, 204 A.3d 284, 237 N.J. 307 (N.J. 2019).

Pincite

204 A.3d 284 (In re Greenman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.