In re Greenberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Greenberg

727 A.2d 113, 556 Pa. 101

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

DocketNo. 762 Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 727 A.2d 113 (In re Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Greenberg, 727 A.2d 113, 556 Pa. 101 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 1999, a Rule having been issued upon Lawrence D. Greenberg on January 12, 1999, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered, upon consideration of the responses filed, the request for oral argument is denied, the Rule is made absolute and the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in this matter. Justice CAPPY dissents and would grant the Petition for Reinstatement. Justice NIGRO dissents and would grant the request for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 1999, a Rule having been issued upon Lawrence D. Greenberg on January 12, 1999, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered, upon consideration of the responses filed, the request for oral argument is denied, the Rule is made absolute and the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby denied. Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice NEWMAN did not participate in this matter. Justice CAPPY dissents and would grant the Petition for Reinstatement. Justice NIGRO dissents and would grant the request for oral argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

727 A.2d 113, 556 Pa. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-greenberg-pa-1999.