In re Greenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Greenberg

109 A.D.2d 245, 491 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.2d 245 (In re Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Greenberg, 109 A.D.2d 245, 491 N.Y.S.2d 631, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department has moved to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).

Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Department on March 30, 1960.

Respondent was suspended indefinitely as an attorney and counselor-at-law by order of this court entered August 18, 1983. He entered a guilty plea to the charge of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.30), a class E felony, in the Supreme Court, New York County, on March 15, 1985. Upon respondent’s plea of guilty to the felony charge, he has been automatically disbarred (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]).

A certified copy of the disposition has been presented to this court (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b]).

Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b]; Matter of Cohen, 107 AD2d 189.)

[246]*246Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Bloom and Ellerin, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI