In Re Green

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Green

1943 OK CR 84, 140 P.2d 245, 77 Okla. Crim. 157, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 21, 1943

DocketNo. A-10385.

StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK CR 84 (In Re Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Green, 1943 OK CR 84, 140 P.2d 245, 77 Okla. Crim. 157, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26 (Okla. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Clarence R. Green, filed in this court a petition for writ of habeas corpus on February 24, 194S, alleging that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by Frank Smith, Chief of Police of Oklahoma City. A response to the petition was filed on the 26th day of February, 1943, in which it is set up that petitioner was released from custody on the 25th day of February, 1943, at the hour of about 8:30 a.m., and about one hour before the writ to show cause was received by respondent.

It therefore appears that petitioner, having theretofore been discharged, that it is unnecessary to assume jurisdiction in this case.

For the reasons stated, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Clarence R. Green, filed in this court a petition for writ of habeas corpus on February 24, 194S, alleging that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by Frank Smith, Chief of Police of Oklahoma City. A response to the petition was filed on the 26th day of February, 1943, in which it is set up that petitioner was released from custody on the 25th day of February, 1943, at the hour of about 8:30 a.m., and about one hour before the writ to show cause was received by respondent.

It therefore appears that petitioner, having theretofore been discharged, that it is unnecessary to assume jurisdiction in this case.

For the reasons stated, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK CR 84, 140 P.2d 245, 77 Okla. Crim. 157, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-green-oklacrimapp-1943.