In Re Green

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Green

1924 OK CR 129, 226 P. 1117, 225 P. 1117, 27 Okla. Crim. 120, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 139

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 30, 1924

DocketNo. A-4487.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 129 (In Re Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Green, 1924 OK CR 129, 226 P. 1117, 225 P. 1117, 27 Okla. Crim. 120, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 139 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

*121 PEE CUEIAM.

This was an application to this court for writ of habeas corpus by Elmer Green, filed November 1, 1922, alleging illegal restraint by Jack Smith, sheriff of Canadian county, upon an order of commitment based on a verdict of a jury returned October 30, 1922, in the county court of Canadian county, finding petitioner guilty on a charge of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor, alleging that said restraint is illegal because the 11th day of November, 1922, was set for judgment and sentence, and said court refused to allow bail during the interim, and asking that bail be allowed. Whereupon a rule to show cause was entered and issued why the writ of habeas corpus should not be awarded as prayed for, and it was ordered that petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $1,000, as by law required, the same to be approved by the court clerk of said county. Upon the return day petitioner appeared by his counsel and asked that the rule be discharged and the cause dismissed. The rule is therefore discharged, and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of respondent, and the cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*121 PEE CUEIAM.

This was an application to this court for writ of habeas corpus by Elmer Green, filed November 1, 1922, alleging illegal restraint by Jack Smith, sheriff of Canadian county, upon an order of commitment based on a verdict of a jury returned October 30, 1922, in the county court of Canadian county, finding petitioner guilty on a charge of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor, alleging that said restraint is illegal because the 11th day of November, 1922, was set for judgment and sentence, and said court refused to allow bail during the interim, and asking that bail be allowed. Whereupon a rule to show cause was entered and issued why the writ of habeas corpus should not be awarded as prayed for, and it was ordered that petitioner be admitted to bail in the sum of $1,000, as by law required, the same to be approved by the court clerk of said county. Upon the return day petitioner appeared by his counsel and asked that the rule be discharged and the cause dismissed. The rule is therefore discharged, and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of respondent, and the cause dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 129, 226 P. 1117, 225 P. 1117, 27 Okla. Crim. 120, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-green-oklacrimapp-1924.