In re Green
This text of 176 A.D. 934 (In re Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs, and application granted, without costs. We think that if the applicant’s buildings were not to be considered, the consent of the owner of the other building was essential, and that such consent by one of the tenants by the entirety was insufficient, and that if the applicant’s buildings were to be considered, then his application, being unacknowledged, could not stand as his statutory consent.
See Liquor Tax Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 34; Laws of 1909, chap. 39), § 15, subd. 8, asamd. by Laws of 1915, chap. 654.—[Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 A.D. 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-green-nyappdiv-1917.