In re Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Green

176 A.D. 934

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 171 A.D. 583 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1917·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and application granted, without costs. We think that if the applicant’s buildings were not to be considered, the consent of the owner of the other building was essential, and that such consent by one of the tenants by the entirety was insufficient, and that if the applicant’s buildings were to be considered, then his application, being unacknowledged, could not stand as his statutory consent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, without costs, and application granted, without costs. We think that if the applicant’s buildings were not to be considered, the consent of the owner of the other building was essential, and that such consent by one of the tenants by the entirety was insufficient, and that if the applicant’s buildings were to be considered, then his application, being unacknowledged, could not stand as his statutory consent.

In re Green, 176 A.D. 934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

176 A.D. 934 (In re Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.