In Re Greater Houston Orthopaedic Specialists, Inc.

295 S.W.3d 345, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6959, 2008 WL 4173324
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 11, 2008
Docket13-08-00366-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 S.W.3d 345 (In Re Greater Houston Orthopaedic Specialists, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Greater Houston Orthopaedic Specialists, Inc., 295 S.W.3d 345, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6959, 2008 WL 4173324 (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On June 6, 2008, relator, Greater Houston Orthopaedic Specialists, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause, in which it alleges that on April 7, 2008, the respondent, the Honorable Arturo McDonald, Jr., Presiding Judge of the County Court at Law No. 1 of Cameron County, Texas, abused his discretion by setting aside an order of dismissal in cause No. 2006-CCL-133-A entered on April 3, 2008. In addition, relators allege that on April 24, 2008 respondent granted the real parties’ in interest, Jody Griswold and Peter Zavaletta’s, motion to set case for trial, and entered an order setting final jury trial. Cause No. 2006-CCL-133-A is currently set for trial at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, October 27, 2008. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the respondent to: (1) vacate the trial court’s order dated April 7, 2008; (2) vacate the trial court’s order dated April 24, 2008; and (3) enter an order dismissing Cause No. 2006-CCL-133-A.

The Court, having examined and fully considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, real parties’ in interest response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, and relator’s reply to response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown itself entitled to the relief sought and the *346 petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.

The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Greater Houston Orthopaedic Specialists, Inc.
295 S.W.3d 323 (Texas Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 S.W.3d 345, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6959, 2008 WL 4173324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-greater-houston-orthopaedic-specialists-inc-texapp-2008.