in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 28, 2022·No. 13-22-00124-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00124-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

On March 25, 2022, relator Great Lakes Insurance SE (Great Lakes) filed a petition

for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying Great

Lake’s motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit based on a contractual forum selection

clause. The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Michael L. Hurst, Phillip R.

Hurst, Jimmy L. Williams, Vivian E. Williams, and Wager & Associates, Inc., or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of March, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE (in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.