in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE
This text of in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE (in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00124-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On March 25, 2022, relator Great Lakes Insurance SE (Great Lakes) filed a petition
for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying Great
Lake’s motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit based on a contractual forum selection
clause. The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Michael L. Hurst, Phillip R.
Hurst, Jimmy L. Williams, Vivian E. Williams, and Wager & Associates, Inc., or any others
whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the
petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 28th day of March, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-great-lakes-insurance-se-texapp-2022.