in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00124-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On March 25, 2022, relator Great Lakes Insurance SE (Great Lakes) filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by denying Great Lake’s motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit based on a contractual forum selection clause. The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Michael L. Hurst, Phillip R. Hurst, Jimmy L. Williams, Vivian E. Williams, and Wager & Associates, Inc., or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of
this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 28th day of March, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE (in Re Great Lakes Insurance SE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.