In re Greaser

101 N.W. 235, 72 Neb. 612, 1904 Neb. LEXIS 233
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 2, 1904
DocketNo. 13,620
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 N.W. 235 (In re Greaser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Greaser, 101 N.W. 235, 72 Neb. 612, 1904 Neb. LEXIS 233 (Neb. 1904).

Opinion

Oldham, C.

This was a proceeding in habeas corpus in the district court for Colfax county, Nebraska. There was a judgment for the relators in the court below, which respondents seek to have reviewed by this court on appeal. No motion was filed for a new trial in the court below, nor was a petition in error filed in this court. This leaves but one question to determine, and that is as to the form of the procedure under which this court will review the judgment of a district court in habeas corpus. This question was before us in the case of In re Van Scierer, 42 Neb. 772, and, after a careful examination of the proper method of review of causes of this nature by this court, we determined that proceedings in habeas corpus were civil in their nature and could, and would, be reviewed here on error proceedings, but not on appeal. We think the rule well supported in principle, and therefore recommend that the appeal in the case at bar be dismissed.

Ames and Letton, CC., concur.

By the Court:

For the reasons, stated in the foregoing opinion, the appeal in the case at bar is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Selicow v. Dunn
160 N.W. 991 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 N.W. 235, 72 Neb. 612, 1904 Neb. LEXIS 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-greaser-neb-1904.