In re Gray

113 A.D.2d 500, 496 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52954

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on November 14,1979.

On September 11, 1985, respondent was found guilty, after a nonjury trial in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, of three counts of grand larceny in the second degree, all class D felonies (Penal Law § 155.35). On October 9, 1985 respondent was sentenced to five years’ probation, with the condition that he make restitution and perform 2,000 hours of community service.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. Respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on November 14,1979.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. Respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

In re Gray, 113 A.D.2d 500, 496 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

113 A.D.2d 500 (In re Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

In re Padilla

494 N.E.2d 1050 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Opinion

Related