In re Gray
This text of 474 F. App'x 984 (In re Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Linwood Gray and Darrell Bracey petition for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on their Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the denial of their 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion and also delayed ruling on their motion for recusal. They seek an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has recently entered an order denying the Petitioners’ motions. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 F. App'x 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gray-ca4-2012.