In re Grant
10 F. Cas. 973, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 106
This text of 10 F. Cas. 973 (In re Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Grant, 10 F. Cas. 973, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 106 (D.S.C. 1868).
Opinion
Duncan D. McCall having been chosen assignee by the greater part in value and number of the cred tors who have proved their debts, and there being no imputation either upon his character or competency, the judge does not feel himself competent to. interfere, and does not interfere. He is assignee by virtue of the law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Lewensohn
98 F. 576 (S.D. New York, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 F. Cas. 973, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grant-scd-1868.