In re: Grandinetti

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 9, 2025·No. SCPW-25-0000086·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JUL-2025 07:45 AM Dkt. 5 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

IN RE FRANCIS GRANDINETTI ________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 3PC930000141)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the document filed February 13, 2025,

which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, and the

record, an extraordinary writ is unwarranted because Petitioner

has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief.

See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319,

537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).

It is ordered that the petition is denied without prejudice

to refiling should the circuit court not act on the documents

that were filed by Petitioner in 3PC930000141. It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall serve

a copy of the petition and this order on the administrative

judge of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 9, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Grandinetti, (haw 2025).

In re: Grandinetti (In re: Grandinetti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
537 P.3d 1154 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023)