In re: Grandinetti
This text of In re: Grandinetti (In re: Grandinetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JUL-2025 07:45 AM Dkt. 5 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
IN RE FRANCIS GRANDINETTI ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 3PC930000141)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITHOUT PREJUDICE (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the document filed February 13, 2025,
which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus, and the
record, an extraordinary writ is unwarranted because Petitioner
has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief.
See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319,
537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied without prejudice
to refiling should the circuit court not act on the documents
that were filed by Petitioner in 3PC930000141. It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall serve
a copy of the petition and this order on the administrative
judge of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 9, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Grandinetti, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grandinetti-haw-2025.