In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams

Third Circuit

In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams

963 F.2d 567

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 11, 1992·No. Nos. 91-3353 to 91-3356·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the court in banc pursuant to this court’s Internal Operating Procedure 9.4.1, it is hereby

ORDERED that the order of the district court dated May 8, 1991, 766 F.Supp. 358, quashing the subpoenas duces tecum to Janet Williams and the Pittsburgh Press Company, Michael Bucsko and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, WPXI, Inc., and Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc., t/d/b/a KDKA-TV to produce documents before the Grand Jury be, and the same is, hereby affirmed by an equally divided court.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the court in banc pursuant to this court’s Internal Operating Procedure 9.4.1, it is hereby

ORDERED that the order of the district court dated May 8, 1991, 766 F.Supp. 358, quashing the subpoenas duces tecum to Janet Williams and the Pittsburgh Press Company, Michael Bucsko and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, WPXI, Inc., and Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc., t/d/b/a KDKA-TV to produce documents before the Grand Jury be, and the same is, hereby affirmed by an equally divided court.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams, 963 F.2d 567 (3d Cir. 1992).

Pincite

963 F.2d 567 (In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related