In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Doe One, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
This text of 24 F.3d 246 (In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Doe One, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
24 F.3d 246
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA.
DOE ONE, INC., Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 93-35068.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 5, 1994.
Decided May 16, 1994.
Before: SCHROEDER, BOOCHEVER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The court has reviewed the record in this case and heard the arguments of counsel. The order of the district court denying the motion to quash the subpoena is affirmed. The appellant has provided no basis in this record for us to hold that the denial was in error or that compliance with the district court's order, will result in any substantial revelation of Mr. Holmes' attorney work product.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F.3d 246, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19018, 1994 WL 192416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grand-jury-subpoena-doe-one-inc-intervenor-a-ca9-1994.