Home/Ninth Circuit/In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Doe One, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Doe One, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States

24 F.3d 246, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19018, 1994 WL 192416
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 16, 1994·No. 93-35068·Published

Opinion

24 F.3d 246
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA.
DOE ONE, INC., Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 93-35068.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 5, 1994.
Decided May 16, 1994.

Before: SCHROEDER, BOOCHEVER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The court has reviewed the record in this case and heard the arguments of counsel. The order of the district court denying the motion to quash the subpoena is affirmed. The appellant has provided no basis in this record for us to hold that the denial was in error or that compliance with the district court's order, will result in any substantial revelation of Mr. Holmes' attorney work product.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Doe One, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States, 24 F.3d 246, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19018, 1994 WL 192416 (9th Cir. 1994).

24 F.3d 246 (In Re Grand Jury Subpoena. Doe One, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.