In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. Richard Shocker

541 F.2d 464, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6719
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1976·No. 76-3195·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Shocker appeals his adjudication of civil contempt for refusing to furnish handwriting exemplars in connection with a grand jury investigation. A careful examination of his several complaints — the major burden of which is that he was justified in refusing to provide the exemplars since they were sought for harassment, could have been obtained elsewhere, etc. — establishes that, with one exception, they are meritless. The order of commitment fails to recite that it is subject to the limitation, among others, of the life of the term of the grand jury, including extensions, before which his refusal to comply with the court order occurred. 28 U.S.C. § 1826 (1970). It should have so recited, for it is so limited. The order is modified to incorporate this additional limitation. Should the term of the subject grand jury already have expired, Shocker shall receive credit on the service of his unrelated criminal sentence, which was interrupted by his contempt incarceration, for any days served by him after the expiration of that term. As modified, the order below is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. Richard Shocker, 541 F.2d 464, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6719 (5th Cir. 1976).

541 F.2d 464 (In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United States of America v. Richard Shocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Apple Macpro Computer Apple Ma
949 F.3d 102 (Third Circuit, 2020)
Free v. Miles
Fifth Circuit, 2003
United States v. Donald Dien
598 F.2d 743 (Second Circuit, 1979)