In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant

904 F.2d 1498, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9982, 1990 WL 83997
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 21, 1990·No. 88-5056·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

On April 30, 1990, the grand jury for the Southern District of Florida issued a new subpoena identical to the subpoena that gave rise to this case. Appellee has fully complied with the new subpoena.

Appellee now moves to dismiss this appeal as moot, and appellant joins in the motion. The panel opinion, published at 896 F.2d 1267, has already been vacated by our order of May 16,1990, granting rehearing en banc. The panel opinion will remain vacated, the judgment of the district court, 717 F.Supp. 1502, is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions that the case be dismissed. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant, 904 F.2d 1498, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9982, 1990 WL 83997 (11th Cir. 1990).

904 F.2d 1498 (In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Sam Rabin, Witness-Appellee v. United States of America, Movant-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings 89-10 (Mia)
938 F.2d 1578 (Eleventh Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Moody
763 F. Supp. 589 (M.D. Georgia, 1991)