In Re: Graff
This text of In Re: Graff (In Re: Graff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF ______________________
2014-1288 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 10/885,569. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office P.C., of Chicago, Illinois.
JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Pa- tent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solici- tor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Graff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-graff-cafc-2014.