in Re: Graciano Alvarado

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 13, 2006
Docket13-06-00387-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Graciano Alvarado (in Re: Graciano Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Graciano Alvarado, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-387-CR

                         COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

IN RE: GRACIANO ALVARADO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

                      Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator, Graciano Alvarado, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 10, 2006, in which he alleges that the respondent, the Honorable Leticia Lopez, Presiding Judge of the 389th Judicial District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, abused her discretion by failing to respond to relator=s pro se motion for nunc pro tunc requesting respondent to correct the amount of jail time awarded in the judgment.   


The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.  Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 13th day of July, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Graciano Alvarado, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-graciano-alvarado-texapp-2006.