In re G.P.
This text of 2015 Ohio 4091 (In re G.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re G.P., 2015-Ohio-4091.]
COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
IN THE MATTER OF: : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. G.P. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J. DELINQUENT CHILD : : : Case No. 15-CA-23 : : OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, Case No. 2014-DEL-00730
JUDGMENT: Affirmed
DATE OF JUDGMENT: September 30, 2015
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellant For Defendant-Appellee
LILLIAN R. SHUN JOHN S. DILTS 38 South Park Street 28 South Park Street Mansfield, OH 44902 Mansfield, OH 44902 Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23 2
Farmer, J.
{¶1} The Huron County Juvenile Court adjudicated appellee, G.P., delinquent
for having committed one count of gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05.
On December 1, 2014, finding that appellee was residing with his maternal
grandparents in Richland County, the Huron County court transferred the case to the
Richland County Juvenile Court for final disposition.
{¶2} A status conference was held on January 14, 2015 during which
appellee's parents acknowledged they were the minor's legal custodians and they
resided in Huron County, but appellee was residing with his maternal grandparents in
Richland County.
{¶3} A dispositional hearing was held on March 3, 2015. By judgment entry
filed same date, the trial court accepted the transfer from the Huron County Juvenile
Court, and committed appellee to the Ohio Department of Youth Services for an
indeterminate period of six months to age 21, suspended in lieu of community control
until age 21. Also on March 3, 2015, the trial court filed a supplemental judgment entry,
placing appellee in the temporary custody of his maternal grandmother who resided in
{¶4} Appellant, the state of Ohio, filed an appeal and this matter is now before
this court for consideration. Assignment of error is as follows:
I
{¶5} "THE COURT COMMITTED ERROR WHEN IT ACCEPTED TRANSFER
OF G.P.'S CASE BECAUSE A JUVENILE CASE MAY ONLY BE TRANSFERRED TO
THE COUNTY OF THE CHILD'S RESIDENCE." Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23 3
{¶6} Appellant claims the trial court lacked jurisdiction to determine disposition
because appellee's parents are the minor's legal custodians and they reside in Huron
County and pursuant to R.C. 2151.06, a minor's residence is presumed to be the
residence of his/her parents. We disagree that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.
{¶7} Juv.R. 11 governs transfer to another county. Subsection (A) states the
following:
If the child resides in a county of this state and the proceeding is
commenced in a court of another county, that court, on its own motion or a
motion of a party, may transfer the proceeding to the county of the child's
residence upon the filing of the complaint or after the adjudicatory or
dispositional hearing for such further proceeding as required. The court of
the child's residence shall then proceed as if the original complaint had
been filed in that court. Transfer may also be made if the residence of the
child changes.
{¶8} After finding appellee delinquent for having committed one count of gross
sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05, the Huron County Juvenile Court
transferred the case to Richland County, finding the following in its judgment filed
December 1, 2014: Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23 4
Thereupon, the Court found that the minor child herein, [G.P.], is in
the custody of maternal grandparents, Mr. and Mrs. Robson, and they
reside at 1410 Paradise View Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44905.
It appearing that the child in this case has a legal settlement in the
County of Richland, State of Ohio; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and
decreed that jurisdiction over said child be transferred to Richland County
Juvenile Court.
{¶9} In its judgment entry filed March 3, 2015, the trial court accepted the
transfer and proceeded to disposition, ordering the following in part:
The Court places the minor child, [G.P.], in the temporary custody
of his grandmother, Kimberly Brown-Robson. Address: 1410 Paradise
View Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44905. Phone: 419-631-6838. DOB:
08/21/1960. SSN:XXX-XX-6874. Referral is made to CSEA for support
determination.
{¶10} The trial court made this same order in a supplemental judgment entry
also filed on March 3, 2015.
{¶11} A pre-disposition report for sex offender assessment was filed on
February 20, 2015 prior to the dispositional hearing and included the following under
"Child and Family History": Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23 5
[G.P.] is 14 year old male who is currently residing with his
maternal grandmother and step-grandfather, Kimberly and Scott Robson.
He went to live there in August '14 through grandparent power of attorney
as a result of this offense.***The original plan is to allow [G.] to stay there
one year through August '15. He sees his parents usually every weekend,
either at his grandparents or occasionally at his own home if his sisters
are gone.
{¶12} During the status conference held on January 14, 2015, the following
discussion was held (T. at 7-9):
THE COURT: Now, um as to both of you, Richard and Elizabeth,
are you together? So you are married, you are together?
ELIZABETH [P.] [MOTHER]: Yes.
THE COURT: And are you the legal custodian of [G.]?
ELIZABETH [P.]: We have custody. My mom has Power of
Attorney. He currently resides with my mother.
THE COURT: Okay. So, so of course you folks are the uh parents.
So by law you're, you're biological parents?
ELIZABETH [P.]: Uh huh.
THE COURT: So by law you are the legal custodian. So what is it,
a grandparent affidavit? How do you have, how do you function? By what
authority do you function? It was mentioned Power of - -. Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23 6
KIMBERLY ROBSON [GRANDMOTHER]: Power of Attorney.
Yeah, we came up here to get it so he could go to school, or I could take
him to the doctor.
THE COURT: Do you have a copy of that?
KIMBERLY ROBSON: Uh huh. Yes I do.
THE COURT: I would like to see that. Because uh, Richard and
Elizabeth, you live in - -?
ELIZABETH [P.]: Willard.
THE COURT: Willard, Huron County.
THE COURT: But the grandparents here, um - -.
ELIZABETH [P.]: Live in Richland.
***
THE COURT: Mansfield. So parents have uh legal custody by
operation of law. And it looks like, do you have other little children in your
home?
THE COURT: Well I mean, is that why you had the transfer, - -
RICHARD [P.]: Yes.
ELIZABETH [P.]: Yes.
THE COURT: - - to sort of get him away from those kids?
THE COURT: And how long have you had [G.]? Richland County, Case No. 15-CA-23 7
KIMBERLY ROBSON: I have had him since the incident in August.
THE COURT: This August. And is it your hope and desire, all of
you, that he will remain with you for the foreseeable future? Or what is,
what is the - -?
ELIZABETH [P.]: When he finishes counseling and gets the green
light to come home our hope is that he is going to come home.
THE COURT: Do you have any idea when that may be?
ELIZABETH [P.]: Uh counseling is at least an eighteen month
program.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 Ohio 4091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gp-ohioctapp-2015.